State v. Baker
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} This case was accepted as a certified conflict between the Ninth and Twelfth District Courts of Appeals to resolve what a judgment of conviction must include pursuant to Crim.R. 32(C) to become a final appealable order. See R.C. 2505.02, delineating final appealable orders. Two interrelated issues are included in this appeal, first, whether “the plea, the verdict or findings, and the sentence,” Crim.R. 32(C), must be contained in one document; and second, whether the judgment of conviction must include the plea entered at arraignment. We hold that the judgment of conviction is a single…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BirdOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. TripodoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Leis v. KraftOhio Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by450 opinions
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
445 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.