Legal Opinion
Beatty v. Alston
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1975No. 74-811PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
Crim. R. 25(B) provides:
“If for any reason the judge before whom the defendant has been tried1 is unable to perform the duties of the court after a verdict or finding of guilt, another judge designated by the administrative judge, or, in the case of a single-judge division, by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, may perform those duties. If such other judge is satisfied that he cannot perform those duties because he did not preside at the trial, he may in his discretion grant a new trial.”
This rule inferentially commands that unless unable to do so, the judge who presided at a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Brook Park v. NecakOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Berger v. BergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Columbus v. MesserOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. McCollochOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.