Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1953No. 32538PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

Plaintiff brought this action, as administratrix, to recover the alleged balance due on a contract between defendant and Oscar Anderson, deceased. Defendant cross-complained to recover a payment allegedly made to plaintiff by mistake. The jury returned a verdict denying plaintiff recovery and awarding defendant the amount for which she cross-complained. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment entered on this verdict, and directs her assignments of error to the denial of her motion for a new trial.

The issues of fact, outlined in the instructions to the jury, are as follows:

Plaintiff alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meyer v. StromWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hopkins v. BarlinWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Schrock v. GillinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Floe v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Miller v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Agranoff v. MortonWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Boettcher v. BusseWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Estate of Lennon v. LennonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Hampton v. GillelandWashington Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API