Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Strom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1951No. 31460PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

Harold O. Meyer, the lessor of certain well-drilling equipment, brought this action to recover damages in the sum of $909.99, for a breach of the written lease agreement. The lessee, Bert A. Strom, and Strom’s wife, as defendants in the action, contested some of the items relied upon by plaintiff. They also filed a counterclaim seeking recovery for materials and services furnished to plaintiff. The effect of the answer and counterclaim was to seek a set-off of all sums admittedly due on the plaintiff’s claim, and to obtain judgment in behalf of the defendants in the sum of $250.34.

The case…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Fiorito v. GoerigWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Ross v. RaymerWashington Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hewitt v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Williams v. Idaho Potato Starch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API