Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Gilleland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1963No. 36098PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Suit to partition real estate. The main questions are: The application of the dead man’s statute where the adverse party is called as a witness; the effect of delivery of a deed; and the presumptions attending the execution of a deed.

On July 16, 1921, Charles J. Hampton executed a deed naming his seven children as grantees to an 80-acre parcel of real estate in Lewis County. The deed recited a consideration of $1, and that the grantees agreed to assume a Federal Loan Bank mortgage and a second mortgage held by the State Bank of Morton. The deed further warranted that the grantor was owner in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robertson v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Raborn v. HaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Findley v. FindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Estate of Wind v. WindWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Boettcher v. BusseWashington Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Erickson v. KERR, MDPS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Wildman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API