Estate of Lennon v. Lennon
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
This is an action brought by the personal representative of the estate of Elsie Lennon to recover the proceeds from stock certificates sold by Roger Lennon, Elsie’s stepson. Relying on the deadman’s statute,1 the estate submitted redacted portions of Roger’s declaration and deposition in support of its argument that Roger converted the stocks for his own benefit and wrote unauthorized checks from Elsie’s account. Roger argues that the estate waived the deadman’s statute by submitting evidence of transactions with the decedent. The trial court *171found that the estate did not waive the deadman’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Inniss v. Tandy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Robertson v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kellar v. Estate of KellarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Martin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Estate of Lennon v. LennonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In Re the Estate of LoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Martin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.