Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1966No. 329PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

The record does not show the verdict, judgment, appeal, entries, or return to the appeal from the Caldwell County Recorder’s Court, which is assigned as error by the appellant. However, the record contains a stipulation that the defendant was tried in the Recorder’s Court; was found guilty, and appealed from the judgment pronounced to the Superior Court of Caldwell County. The corollary of this situation appeared in S. v. Hill, 223 N.C. 753, 28 S.E. 2d 99, in which the record showed no appeal entries in the municipal court. The attorney general moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. State v. BrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API