Legal Opinion

State v. . Perry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1946PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Criminal prosecution, tried upon indictment charging several defendants with an assault with deadly weapons upon one Henry Eatman, with intent to kill, resulting in serious bodily harm.

At the close of the State's evidence, motion to dismiss as of nonsuit was allowed as to all the defendants except Phelon Perry and Modis Perry.

The evidence for the State tends to show that the prosecuting witness owns and operates a store and filling station near Bailey, in Nash County, North Carolina. On 19 May, 1945, the defendant Phelon Perry, accompanied by Bryce Eatman, went to this store and stayed about…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. TorainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API