Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1970No. 17PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant Lee demanded and was denied the right to make the closing argument to the jury. This is his first assignment of error.

Rule 3, Rules of Practice in the Superior Courts of North Carolina, provides that “[i]n all cases, civil or criminal, when no evidence is introduced by the defendant, the right of reply and conclusion shall belong to his counsel.” See G.S. 4-A, Appendix 1(2), page 201.

Construing this rule in State v. Robinson, 124 N.C. 801, 32 S.E. 494 (1899), the Court held that where there are several defendants, and one of them introduces evidence, “that gives the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API