Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Willson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1931No. Motion No. 9629PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Commissioner SHARP

delivered the opinion of the court.

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus against the members of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth Supreme Judicial District at Texarkana. The mandamus is sought for the purpose of requiring that court to certify a conflict of decisions, which it is alleged exists between an opinion in that court in this case (37 S. W. (2d) 240), the Supreme Court and certain courts of civil appeals. The petition shows that the cause pending in the Court of Civil Appeals is an appeal from a judgment of the county court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Middlebrook & Brother v. David Bradley Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Warner v. Gohlman, Lester Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. National Compress Co. v. HamlinTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hinn v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Stevens v. Southern Ice & Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Snyder v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brazos Valley Harvestore Systems, Inc. v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Reagan County Purchasing Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API