Legal Opinion

National Compress Co. v. Hamlin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1925No. Application No. 13762, Application No. 13772, Application No. 13827, Application No. 13550, Application No. 13657, Application No. 13713, Application No. 13709PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenwood, J.

Should the court’s long-established practice be followed, no written opinions would be filed in disposing of the applications for writs of error in the above-styled causes. The questions presented by these applications, however, are typical of so great a number which are constantly brought here for review that we have deemed it important to state the questions and the grounds for the conclusions that they are without or within the court’s jurisdiction.

The first application is in a suit where defendant in error, Hamlin, recovered a judgment of plaintiff in error, National Compress Company, for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wilson v. Freeman, ReceiverTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kirksey v. Southern Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Decker v. KirlicksTexas Supreme Court · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hastings Oil Co. v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. State ex rel. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Reynolds v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Brown v. ForeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API