Snyder v. Pitts

The question here is whether a defendant has established a second residence apart from his domicile within the meaning of the first sentence of Art. 1995 R.C.S. It arises in a suit in volving a contract with a defense of accord and satisfaction. Both the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals (with dissent) held that a second residence had been established and overruled the plea of privilege. The defendants in the trial court (relators here) contend there is “no evidence” to support the trial court’s judgment. See the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals as reported in Synder v. Johnson,…