Legal Opinion

Meredith v. McClendon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1938No. 7242PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Relator seeks by mandamus to compel the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Judicial District to certify to this Court for decision the question of law whether that court was correct in reversing the judgment of the district court, which sustained relator's plea of privilege to be sued in Dallas County, instead of Coleman County, as shown by the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in the case of James v. Meredith, 101 S.W.2d 866.

Clifton James filed in the district court of Coleman County a suit for damages against Carlton Meredith. The parties in that suit will be designated here…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Coalson v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MangumTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Austin v. William Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Connor v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1891

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Belo Corp. v. Thomas BlantonTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. National Life Co. v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Burtis v. Butler Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lyle v. WaddleTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Barron v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1946

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API