Legal Opinion

Scott v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1944No. 3357PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

This action was brought under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act 1938, 52 Stat. 1069, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), to recover damages and alleged unpaid overtime.

The sole issue for determination is whether the plaintiff comes within the protection of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

A jury trial was waived, and the case was submitted upon the pleadings and additional testimony. Accordingly, I make the following

Findings of Fact

1. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc., was employed by the Defense Plant Corporation, a corporation created by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Barbe v. Cummins Const. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  4. Ouendag v. GibsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1943
  5. Samuels v. HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Reed v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. Snyder v. Dravo Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Brue v. J. Rich Steers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  5. Collins v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API