Legal Opinion

Brue v. J. Rich Steers, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 21, 1945PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

Donoghue, one of the plaintiffs in this suit for overtime. wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., has moved for summary judgment. The defendants are four contracting companies who were joint venturers on a contract with the United States to construct new dry docks at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. It is conceded that the plaintiffs were inspectors and do not come within the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 276a, or of 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 324 — 326. The moving plaintiff has submitted affidavits describing his part in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Walling v. Patton-Tulley Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ritch v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Scholl v. McWilliams Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Crabb v. Welden Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  4. Bennett v. v. P. Loftis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  5. Burke v. Mesta MacH. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API