Legal Opinion

Collins v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1946No. Civ. A. 5179PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant for summary judgment.

From the complaint, answer and affidavits it appears, without dispute, that the defendant-employer, under contract with Jacobs Aircraft Engine Company acting as agent for the Defense Plant Corporation, was supervising the construction of a plant for Jacobs Aircraft Engine Company of Pottstown, Pennsylvania. The plaintiff’s employment was at the plant site and all his duties were performed there.

It has been settled by a large number of decisions that the original construction of a factory building does not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Brown v. Minngas Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Scholl v. McWilliams Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Kenneth R. Brown, Doing Business as Brown Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  4. McComb v. TurpinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  5. Kelly v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API