Legal Opinion

Barbe v. Cummins Const. Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 8, 1943No. Civil Action 906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

This is a suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover unpaid compensation for overtime work under section 207. That section provides: '

“No employer shall, except as otherwise provided in this section, employ any of his employees who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce—
“(1) for a workweek longer than forty-four hours during the first year from the effective date of this section [Oct. 24, 1938],
“(2) for a workweek longer than forty-two hours during the second year from such date, or
“(3) for a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ritch v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Crabb v. Welden Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  4. Brue v. J. Rich Steers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  5. Scott v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API