Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1953No. Docket 41; Calendar 45,803PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

On January 28,1948, Mas L. Johnston and Marian B. Johnston, his wife, plaintiffs, entered into the following agreement with the Austin Field Pipe Line Company, a Michigan corporation, predecessor in interest of the Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, a Michigan corporation, defendant:

“Right-oe-Way Agreement 231
“For and in consideration of the sum of $50.50 to us in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Mas L. Johnston and Marian B. Johnston, his wife, do hereby grant, convey and warrant to Aus tin Field Pipe Line Co. a Michigan corporation with offices at Detroit, Michigan, its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wardell v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Von Meding v. StrahlMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Deberry v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Miller v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morris v. MetriyakoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Heydon v. Mediaone of Southeast Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. James R. and Jamila J. Fleet v. Webber Springs Owners Assoc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Kahn-Reiss, Inc. v. Detroit & Northern Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. North Dade Water Co. v. Florida State Turnpike Auth.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API