Wardell v. Williams
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Detroit. (Cbipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in head-note 1.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This suit was commenced to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract for the conveyance of certain real estate by defendant to plaintiff.
The defendant was the owner of a parcel of land containing about 116 acres, situated a short distance from the city of Detroit. He had platted the land into lots and streets, but no streets had been actually opened or lots sold, but the whole *54thereof was occupied as a farm. He had been desirous of selling his property, and had, before the date hereinafter mentioned, placed it in the hands of a real-estate agent for sale, but without success.
On the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carr v. DuvalSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Burnet v. BiscoNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Hazard v. New England Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1832
- Chamberlain v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Bean v. BurbankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1840
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Spivey v. Saner-Ragley Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Ex parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Monahan v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1913
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.