Legal Opinion

Deberry v. Young

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1851PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinney, J.:

Young, the plaintiff in the action, declares in the second count upon a contract to th6 effect, that for the sum of $100,00 he would make and put in a water wheel to a saw mill of the defendant, which would cause said mill to cut 1500 feet of lumber per day, with a head of five and a half feet of water — which head of water the defendant undertook to supply. This action is brought to recover said sum of one hundred dollars.

If, in accordance with the contract, the wheel- was so constructed and attached to the mill, that on the stipulated head of water being supplied by defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bristoe v. Evans and M'campbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1815
  2. Sample v. LooneyTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1804
  3. Irwin v. BellTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1809

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  2. Cohen v. MeadorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  3. Kambour v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  4. The STATE v. WorthySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. MaxeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API