Deberry v. Young
Tennessee Supreme Court
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinney, J.:
Young, the plaintiff in the action, declares in the second count upon a contract to th6 effect, that for the sum of $100,00 he would make and put in a water wheel to a saw mill of the defendant, which would cause said mill to cut 1500 feet of lumber per day, with a head of five and a half feet of water — which head of water the defendant undertook to supply. This action is brought to recover said sum of one hundred dollars.
If, in accordance with the contract, the wheel- was so constructed and attached to the mill, that on the stipulated head of water being supplied by defendant,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bristoe v. Evans and M'campbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1815
- Sample v. LooneyTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1804
- Irwin v. BellTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1809
3Cited by32 opinions
- Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Cohen v. MeadorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
- Kambour v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
- The STATE v. WorthySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- State v. MaxeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.