Legal Opinion

Miller v. Thompson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1876PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Superior Court of Detroit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Cix. J:

The bill in this case was filed to foreclose two mortgages given by Sackfield Macklin upon lands subsequently sold by him to the defendant Thompson. The deed to Thompson was the usual warranty deed with the following clause added *11at the conclusion: “Excepting, however, as against two certain mortgages held by Sidney D. Miller, of Detroit, amounting to six thousand dollars, as of this date, which mortgages the party of the second part assumes and agrees to pay.” One of these mortgages had previously by mistake been discharged of record, and the bill sought to have this discharge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Payne v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Swift v. EdsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  4. Shaw v. HoadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Key West Wharf & Coal Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Higman v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Baber v. . HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Durham v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API