Legal Opinion
Alaskan Crude Corp. v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 2011No. S-13708PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Alaskan Crude Corporation operates an oil and gas unit near Deadhorse known as the Arctic Fortitude Unit. Appellant James W. White is the president of Alaskan Crude and a leaseholder of an oil *414and gas lease that is part of the Arctic Fortitude Unit. Alaskan Crude's unit agreement with the Department of Natural Resources set work obligation deadlines that Alaskan Crude was required to meet to continue operating the Aretic Fortitude Unit. In July 2008 the Department of Natural Resources Commissioner found that Alaskan Crude had failed to meet its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Simpson v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- State, Dept. of Natural Resources v. Alaskan Crude CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.