Legal Opinion

Hill v. Giani

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2013No. 6756 S-13693/S-13713PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

Mary Hill, the owner of an assisted living home, sought damages from Linda Giani, an independent care coordinator; the Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS); and Staci Collier, a state lHeensing specialist; for alleged economic harm caused by a Report of Harm filed by Giani, which resulted in the removal of one of Hill's residents and a subsequent investigation conducted by Collier. The superior court granted summary judgment: to DHSS and Collier on Hill's state law tort claims on the basis of immunity under AS 47.32.160(a); to Collier on Hill's 42 T.S.C. §…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McBeth v. HimesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Yearous v. Niobrara County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Ledgends, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Kinnan v. Sitka CounselingAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Coppe v. BleicherAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Jackson v. Borough of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API