Legal Opinion

Pratt, Read & Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

Upon the trial the plaintiffs offered evidence to prove these facts: The plaintiff Rogers, a resident of Saybrook, was employed by Pratt, Read and Company at Deep River. As a part of the wages paid their employees, the Company transported by motor bus its employees, including Rogers, from their homes to its place of business. The defendant operated a railroad from Saybrook Point to Saybrook Junction, and thence to Hartford as a common carrier of passengers and merchandise in cars drawn by engines propelled by steam. A short distance south of the station at Saybrook Junction the old Boston…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dyson v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  3. Elliott v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. Dean v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. Cowles v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API