Legal Opinion
Californians for Fair Representation—No on 77 v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 2006No. C051100PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
Just prior to the special election of November 8, 2005, petitioners Californians for Fair Representation—No on 77 (hereafter CFR—No on 77) and Theresa Faye Jang-Hefner (collectively, petitioners) petitioned this court for a peremptory writ of mandate, prohibition or other extraordinary relief. They sought to compel respondent the Superior Court of Sacramento County to vacate its order denying a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to require real parties in interest, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor Schwarzenegger’s California Recovery Team (hereafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Thompson v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carson Citizens for Reform v. KawagoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ni v. SlocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Barragan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Ombudsman Services of Northern California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Continental Casualty Company v. GuzmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.