Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Company v. Guzman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 22, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01975Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Continental Casualty Company, No. 2:19-ev-01975-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Lethesia Guzman et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 In this insurance coverage dispute, Continental Casualty Company (CCC) seeks 18 | declaratory judgment under

28 U.S.C. §§ 2201

and 2202 that its auto liability policy for Sprint, 19 | now known as T-Mobile, does not cover third-party claims against defendant Lethesia Guzman. 20 | David Miranda, a Sprint employee, asked Ms. Guzman, who is his partner, to drive his company 21…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
Metz v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
Financial Indemnity Co. v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964
Californians for Fair Representation—No on 77 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.