Barragan v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
After the United States Supreme Court pulled the plug on California’s determinate sentencing law to the extent it had allowed imposition of the upper term based upon certain aggravating facts found by the trial judge, not the jury (Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S._ [166 L.Ed.2d 856, 127 S.Ct. 856] (hereafter Cunningham)), trial courts have scrambled to determine how to apply that academic holding to the real world of criminal cases pending trial.
In this case, in which defendant Alejandro Quinones Barragan is accused of attempted murder and other crimes, the jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Conservatorship of HofferberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Walker v. City of San ClementeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. PantaleonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023