Legal Opinion

Breitman v. Gattman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1948No. Civ. 13678PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

This appeal was taken from a judgment decreeing specific performance of a contract for the sale of a piece of hotel property on Van Ness Avenue in San Francisco.

On December 29, 1945, Louis T. Samuels Company, acting as agent for the seller, negotiated a contract for the sale of the property by appellant Elsa Gattman to respondents for $42,500. The contract acknowledged receipt of a deposit of $1,000 and provided: “Deposit to be increased to $2,000.00 on the tenth . . . day of January 1946.’’ This increased deposit was not made on that day, but on the next day respondents gave the agent their…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ballard v. MacCallumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bell v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Valley View Home of Beaumont, Inc. v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API