Legal Opinion

Moe v. Jolly Joan and Howser

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

' This is an action for damages for assault and battery. Plaintiff was a patron of a bar operated by the corporate defendant Jolly Joan through- its acting manager, the defendant Howser. Plaintiff had originally charged both defendants with responsibility on three counts: negligence, wanton conduct, and assault and battery. Upon completion of plaintiff’s case in chief both defendants moved for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit. It was granted as to the corporate defendant Jolly Joan and denied as to the individual defendant Howser. However, the court struck the counts of negligence and wanton…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Silverton Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lowry v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Konigsberger v. HarveyOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Mitchell v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Indiana Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1986
  2. Politte v. VanderzeeOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Humbird v. McClendonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Adams v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API