Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.

This is an action by Allen Y. Mitchell, inspector of public works in the classified civil service of the City of Portland, to recover judgment for $3,518.14, being the amount of salary he would have received in the period of 21 months and 27 days in the years 1933, 1934 and 1935 had he been permitted to perform his work as an inspector. In the period just mentioned he was laid off, upon orders of his superior, in violation of the provisions of the city’s charter governing civil service. For the only work he performed for the city in the years just mentioned the city made payment in full, but…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Auditors v. BenoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Mattox v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Gracey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Matter of Barmonde v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Gallagher v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Myers v. BD. OF DIR. OF TUALATIN RURAL FIRECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. Moe v. Jolly Joan and HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Cherkezov v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API