Legal Opinion

Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1980No. A7708-10780, CA 13331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Plaintiff was injured in a fall while skiing at defendant’s ski facility on Mt. Hood. He brought this action in negligence against defendant and now appeals the jury’s verdict for defendant.

He assigns as error the court’s instruction to the jury regarding assumption of risk and the court’s refusal to instruct the jury that plaintiff was an invitee at the time of the accident.

Plaintiff had spent a morning skiing on various rums prepared by defendant at its facility. He and a companion agreed to go to the lodge. They chose to go down the North Canyon Run, which plaintiff had never skied. From…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Vendrell v. Sch. Dist. 26C, Malheur Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Parker v. HULT LUMBER & PLYWOOD COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hornbeck v. Western States Fire Apparatus, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Olsen v. Silverton Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hatley v. Skateland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API