Legal Opinion

Humbird v. McClendon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1978No. 418 205, SC 24818PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, J., Pro Tempore.

Plaintiffs brought this action for assault and battery against defendants Mathews for injuries suffered in an inter-family altercation.1

A unanimous jury awarded plaintiffs special, general and punitive damages. Defendants appeal from the resulting judgment, assigning as error the trial court’s (1) denial of their motion for involuntary nonsuit, (2) refusal to give certain instructions, and (3) refusal to permit the filing of defendants’ amended answer and affirmative defense. They also attack the jury verdict as not supported by the evidence. We affirm.

1. Denial of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bakker v. Baza'r, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Moe v. Jolly Joan and HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Konigsberger v. HarveyOregon Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C.O. Homes, LLC v. ClevelandOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Eklof v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Avemco Insurance v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Barker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API