Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Hammond Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1931No. Docket No. 6498PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On petition for rehearing, counsel for respondent contend that the appeal should be dismissed, upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not served within the time provided by law, and therefore that this court is without jurisdiction of the cause. We are of the opinion that this objection, although late in presentation, must be sustained.

The minutes of the court show that at the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ case, on October 10, 1928, “Defendant’s motion for a nonsuit is by the court granted.” The notice of appeal, which was not filed until December 11, 1928, purports to give…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henry v. LingsweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Estate of YaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bengel v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API