Legal Opinion

Henry v. Lingsweiler

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1927No. Docket Nos. 3132, 3133PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

There are two appeals upon the same record, viz.: The one from an order granting a nonsuit and the other from a formal judgment of nonsuit. The appeal from the original order granting the nonsuit was proper and sufficient to authorize a review of the action of the court in the making of said order. In fact, the “order” granting the nonsuit amounted in legal effect to a judgment of nonsuit, since it necessarily involved a final and definitive disposition of the case, and such a judgment is, therefore, one from which an appeal may be taken. The appeal secondly taken, viz.: Prom the “formal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hoppe v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Filson v. BalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API