Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Elliott

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1913No. L.A. No. 3390PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County appointing an administratrix of the estate of a deceased person, and dismissing the petition and contest of another applicant. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Ora E. Elliott having died intestate, rival applications for letters of administration of her estate were filed in the superior court of San Luis Obispo County by Blanche E. Johnston, her daughter, and David L. Elliott, claiming to be her surviving husband. The daughter contested the application of Elliott, on the grounds: 1. That he never had been the husband of the decedent; 2. That he was incompetent to act because he was the surviving partner of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. In Re the Estate of GregorsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In Re the Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API