Legal Opinion

Norman v. Norman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1898No. L. A. No. 469PublishedCited by 39 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Loa Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to have a certain marriage between plaintiff and defendant declared valid and binding upon the parties. A second amended complaint alleged that on August 2, 1897, defendant was a minor of the age of fifteen years and ten months, and that her father, one A. C. Thomson, was her natural and only guardian; plaintiff was of the age of twenty-one years and ten months, and that both plaintiff and defendant were citizens and residents of Los Angeles county, California; on said day plaintiff and defendant, at Long Beach, on the coast of California, boarded a certain fishing and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milliken v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Crapo v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Holmes v. HolmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1870

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. John Roland Phelps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. McDonald v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API