Legal Opinion

Luick v. Arends

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1911PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Richland county; Allen, Judge. Action by Frank E. Luick against John A. Arends. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The evidence is insufficient to justify tbe verdict. Maloney v. Phillips, 118 Iowa, 9, 91 N. W. 757; Bathke v. Krassin, 78 Minn. 272, 80 N. W. 950; Sheriff v. Sheriff, 8 Okla. 124, 56 Pac. 960; Stanley v. Stanley, 27 Wash. 570, 68 Pac. 187; Young v. Young, 8 Wash. 81, 35 Pac. 592; Hollister v. Valentine, 69 App.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Richland county; Allen, Judge. Action by Frank E. Luick against John A. Arends. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The evidence is insufficient to justify tbe verdict. Maloney v. Phillips, 118 Iowa, 9, 91 N. W. 757; Bathke v. Krassin, 78 Minn. 272, 80 N. W. 950; Sheriff v. Sheriff, 8 Okla. 124, 56 Pac. 960; Stanley v. Stanley, 27 Wash. 570, 68 Pac. 187; Young v. Young, 8 Wash. 81, 35 Pac. 592; Hollister v. Valentine, 69 App. Div. 582, 75 N. Y. Supp. 115; Bubenstein v. Bubenstein, 60 App. Div. 238, 69 N. Y. Supp. 1067; Lund v. Spencer, 42 App. Div.…

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, J.

This action is for damages for defendant’s alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife. The complaint charges defendant with alienating the wife’s affections, and that this resulted in the separation of plaintiff’s family. Plaintiff recovered a judgment ordered on a verdict for $3,300. More than two weeks were occupied in the tidal of the case, and the record is very voluminous, containing nearly four hundred assignments of error. The following statement, with the facts appearing in the opinion, will sufficiently explain the law governing the case:

Plaintiff and wife were married in 1887;…

2Cases cited114 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Ex parte BurrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1823
  5. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Schillerstrom v. SchillerstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Knoepfle v. SukoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Amellin v. LeoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API