Hunt v. Mayfield
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Robert P. Ringland, Judge.
In this opinion we are asked to consider several evidentiary questions concerning the admissibility of certain hospital records and testimony based on those hospital records. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the trial court’s decision.
I
Posture of the Case
The fact statements supplied by the parties to this appeal are rather sparse. As nearly as we can determine, appellant worked for General Motors Corporation for approximately twenty-two years. Appellant first worked for Frigidaire, a subsidiary of General Motors. Following the sale of Frigidaire, appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Casey D. Stengel v. Raymond L. Belcher, Individually and as a Police Officer of the Policedepartment of the City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Pryor v. WebberOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Village v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ryan v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HumphriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Hager v. Norfolk Western, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lambert v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Burton v. DutielOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.