Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Connor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. 85-344PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The only issue presented by the instant case is whether physical injuries occasioned solely by emotional stress are compensable under the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Act. Previously, in Toth v. Stan*408dard Oil Co. (1953), 160 Ohio St. 1 [50 O.O. 476], and Szymanski v. Halle’s, supra, this court determined that physical disabilities caused solely by mental or emotional stress were not “injuries” within the meaning of the Act and, therefore, not compensable. In reaching this conclusion, the court effectively limited the payment of workers’ compensation benefits to employees whose physical injuries…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bowman v. National Graphics Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Claim of Santacroce v. 40 W. 20th Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Powell v. Grant Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Rambaldo v. Accurate Die CastingOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API