Legal Opinion

People v. Haney

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1932No. Docket No. 1197PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.

The appellant was charged jointly with Allen Curts with the crime of grand theft consisting of the stealing of three sets of harness, seven horse-collars, seven halters, several bridles, one saddle, one saddle blanket, trappings and a pair of chaps, of a total value in excess of $200, belonging to W. H. Flournoy. The defendant Curts admitted his participation in the crime. The appellant was separately tried and found guilty of grand theft. The accomplice, Allen Curts, was the chief witness against him. From the judgment of conviction the defendant has appealed.

The appellant contends the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Klind v. Valley County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hood v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Vukmanovich v. State Assurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. BreitensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. LizarragaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. People v. AzevedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Minikin v. HendrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Guadalupe RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API