Legal Opinion
Hood v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1918No. L. A. No. 4192. Department TwoPublishedCited by 19 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff sued to recover the value of certain household goods which under an alleged express contract made with defendant were to have been by it stored in a fireproof depository for a compensation agreed upon.
The goods were stored in a nonfireproof building, wherein a fire occurred which destroyed the same.
The court found the contract was made as alleged by plaintiff and that the value of the goods deposited was the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars, for which judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and from which, and an order denying its motion for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Kirstein v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Lynch v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Holmes v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Kahn v. LischnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.