Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Lizarraga

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1954No. Crim. 2452PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *

Defendant was charged with grand theft. After trial by jury he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to prison for the term prescribed by law. He appeals from the judgment.

Defendant does not deny the commission of the crime. In fact, he admitted the theft from the witness stand. His sole point on this appeal is that he should have been convicted of petty theft for the reason that the evidence did not support the implied finding that the value of the property stolen exceeded $200. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1.)

On December 23, 1952, defendant and two others entered the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. People v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. LathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. SorrellArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. State v. BoykenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API