Legal Opinion

People v. Breitenstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1931No. Docket No. 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

In each of four counts of an indictment, defendant Breitenstein and three other persons respectively named Earle, Ward and Dueey were charged with the commission of the crime of grand theft. Earle was the city engineer of the city of Pasadena; Ward was his assistant, and the two defendants Dueey and Breitenstein were partners engaged in said city in the business of contracting in matters affecting various kinds of street improvements. It appears that two several contracts for street improvement work were entered into between the city of Pasadena and the contracting firm of Dueey &…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ChaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API