Legal Opinion

Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1946No. L. A. 18809PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment which declares plaintiffs’ paramount rights, as overlying owners, to the underground waters of the Tia Juana River Basin, and restrains defendant in the exercise of its subordinate appropriative right to pump and export water to points without the watershed.

The main ground urged for reversal is that the trial court erred in concluding that there are in the basin no surplus waters available for exportation by defendant over and above the supply required to satisfy the reasonable, beneficial needs of riparian and overlying owners. It is also contended that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. City of Barstow v. Mojave Water AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API