Legal Opinion

Central Maine Power Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided April 6, 1987No. Civ. No. 83-0056 PPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GENE CARTER, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT BURNS & ROE’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY

Defendant Burns & Roe has moved for a protective order providing that experts who were not timely designated be prohibited from offering testimony against it. On May 23, 1986, this Court approved a discovery schedule in which Plaintiff Hartford Steam Boiler was required to designate any expert witnesses it wished to call by September 1, 1986; Hartford violated this order and did not move to designate experts until February 20, 1987.

This lawsuit concerns an accident…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. John J. Demarines and Doris A. Demarines, Husband and Wife v. Klm Royal Dutch AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Raymond Johnson v. H.K. Webster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Stacey v. Bangor Punta Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Praxair, Inc. v. ATMI, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
  2. Perkasie Industries Corp. v. Advance Transformer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Garrett v. Tandy Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
  4. Seymour v. Consolidated FreightwaysDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API