Legal Opinion
John J. Demarines and Doris A. Demarines, Husband and Wife v. Klm Royal Dutch Airlines
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 17, 1978No. 77-2036PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MAX ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a diversity action for personal injuries and loss of consortium sustained by plaintiffs, Attorney and Mrs. John DeMarines, as a result of an alleged accident aboard an aircraft operated by defendant KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (“KLM”) on an international flight. DeMarines and his wife boarded the KLM flight, chartered by the Pennsylvania Bar Association, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the point of origin, on May 12, 1972. The plane stopped briefly in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to receive another group of passengers and then…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Milton R. Psaty, and Martin M. Psaty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- K.M.C. Co., Inc. v. Irving Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.