Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Tandy Corp.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 24, 2003No. CIV.00-384-P-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY

DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Tandy Corporation d/b/a Radio Shack (“Tandy”) moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f)- and 37(b)(2) to strike the designation of plaintiff John Garrett’s psychiatric expert, .Hugh F. Butts, M.D., and to exclude his testimony during motion practice and trial. See Defendant’s Motion To Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs Psychiatric Expert, etc. (“Motion”) (Docket No. 38). For the reasons that follow, that request is granted.

I. Factual Context

Garrett filed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Macaulay v. AnasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1987
  3. St. Joseph Hospital v. INA Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2006
  2. Odette v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API