Garrett v. Tandy Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY
DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Tandy Corporation d/b/a Radio Shack (“Tandy”) moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f)- and 37(b)(2) to strike the designation of plaintiff John Garrett’s psychiatric expert, .Hugh F. Butts, M.D., and to exclude his testimony during motion practice and trial. See Defendant’s Motion To Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs Psychiatric Expert, etc. (“Motion”) (Docket No. 38). For the reasons that follow, that request is granted.
I. Factual Context
Garrett filed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Macaulay v. AnasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1987
- St. Joseph Hospital v. INA Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Odette v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022