Perkasie Industries Corp. v. Advance Transformer, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McGLYNN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion by the defendant, Advance Transformer, Inc. (“Advance”), requesting a protective order that would strike plaintiff Perkasie Industries Corp.’s (“Perkasie") supplemental responses to defendant’s expert witness interrogatories. Perkasie’s supplemental responses identified three expert witnesses upon whose testimony it is prepared to rely to establish its damages in this case. Advance maintains that these witnesses should be precluded from testifying at trial due to Perkasie’s failure to comply with the court’s pre-trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- John J. Demarines and Doris A. Demarines, Husband and Wife v. Klm Royal Dutch AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Ferrara v. Balistreri & DiMaio, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Tingley Systems, Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. Corporacion Habanos, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Innovative Marketing & Technology, L.L.C. v. Norm Thompson Outfitters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
- Díaz-Casillas v. Doctors' Ctr. Hosp. San JuanUnited States District Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.