Poole v. Schrichte
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The respondent, Irene M. Poole, and the appellant, Herbert A. Schrichte, lived together without the formality of a marriage ceremony, from 1935 to 1941 in Chicago and from 1941 to 1947 in Seattle. The present action is to determine their respective interests in a tavern and certain household furniture and personal property in Mr. Schrichte’s possession.
In January, 1942, they combined their limited resources to acquire a beauty shop, which Mrs. Poole operated under the name of “Crosley Beauty Salon.” (Their resources were then so limited that Mrs. Poole had to borrow fifty dollars to help pay…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Creasman v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Buckley v. BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Walberg v. MattsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Sloan v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.