Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Lindsey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1984No. 49837-7PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Appellant Lana M. Lindsey alleges the trial court erred in utilizing the presumption of Creasman v. Boyle, 31 Wn.2d 345, 196 P.2d 835 (1948) to characterize and distribute property upon dissolution of a marriage which was preceded by a nonmarital family relationship.

In October 1974 appellant and respondent Carl R. Lindsey began a meretricious relationship. The parties subsequently married in June 1976. Although they had no children during this marriage, each had a child from a previous marriage living with them. The parties separated in November 1981. Respondent filed a petition for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Creasman v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Buckley v. BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Davis v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1987

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API